L06 · in-class activity · both cases for every group

Who gets to see the prompt?

Review both confidential-inference designs, then challenge a five-figure investment justified by a compliance claim. Choose responses and discuss your reasons; keep your own notes.

Join your group

Enter the code on the projector.

Lecturer

Opens a room, a projector board and the phase controls.

How it works

Review both designs

Answer two questions per deployment: what the evidence shows and what must change. Finish with one investment recommendation, five choices in total.

Learning goals

Every group reviews both on-prem and hosted confidential inference. Two questions per case ask what the evidence establishes and what must change. This retains the reasoning sequence from observed request path to a justified repair. Key ownership remains in the records and explanations without a separate question.

One final question combines the investment and deployment recommendation. The business asks for a five-figure commitment based on a DORA claim. A supplied legal brief and shared cost assumptions let students assess whether the current evidence justifies that commitment. The lecture slides cover the technical concepts and cost responsibilities; the legal brief supplies additional context.

Two prototype records, a legal brief and shared cost assumptions